Online casinos and offline gambling clubs offer a relatively small range of roulette games. They prefer to add new video slots to their catalogs. There are even fewer roulette types than blackjack or video poker versions.
Many sites are limited to European and American versions—more advanced online clubs also delight customers with the most profitable French roulette. Only online casinos operating on major developers' software include other gambling games.
Naturally, when roulette fans see an unusual novelty, they can not help but make a couple of bets, relying on the mercy of fortune. But is it worth it? Usually, it does not. The fact is that most of the unique versions of roulette offer lower RTPs than the classic variants.
Quality Online Roulette Games
This list includes popular roulette games from famous software providers.
| Name | Soft | Return to player | |||
|
|
98.6% | Play | ||
|
|
97.3% | Play | ||
|
|
97.3% | Play | ||
|
|
97.3% | Play | ||
|
|
97.3% | Play | ||
|
|
97.3% | Play | ||
|
|
97.3% | Play | ||
|
|
97% | Play | ||
|
|
— | |||
|
|
— | Play |
What Is Mini Roulette?
In this article, we will talk about the so-called mini roulette, which some developers of software for online gambling offer. Its main difference from the traditional games is a smaller wheel. Usually, it has only thirteen numbers, from zero to twelve.
The game allows making the following bets (with odds):
- One number - 11:1,
- Two numbers - 5:1,
- Three numbers - 3:1,
- Four numbers - 2:1,
- Columns - 2:1,
- Equal chances (red/black, even/odd, high/low numbers) - 1:1.
If zero is the winning number, the user receives back half of the lost bets in the most favorable versions of the mini roulette.
What Is Mini Roulette's RTP?
Below, we will explain why mini roulette is worse than the traditional European version.
Let's presume you bet one dollar on a straight-up number playing European roulette. On average, you will win thirty-five dollars one time for thirty-seven spins. And in the other thirty-six rounds, you will lose thirty-six dollars. Therefore, you will lose one dollar for the thirty-seven spins. And you will lose $2.7 for one hundred runs. This means that the game has a house edge of 2.7%.
You can independently calculate this index for other roulette bets. You will see that the result will be the same.
Now, let's see what happens while playing mini roulette.
You bet a dollar on any number in each spin. You will lose twelve dollars for thirteen spins, and once you win eleven dollars. Therefore, you'll lose one dollar for every thirteen spins. So you will lose $7.69 for one hundred spins.
This means that the house edge in mini roulette is 7.69%.
As you can see, it is almost three times higher. In other words, you will lose nearly three times more money.
If you play mini roulette with the return of half of the loss, if a zero falls, this index will be decreased to 3.85%. (By the way, NetEnt indicates the exact house edge for its mini roulette.) But even in this case, the game's rules are less favorable than European roulette.
Where Can You Play Online Roulette?
Here are some internet casinos with numerous roulette games from famous software providers.
| Casino | Bonuses | Editors rating | |||
| 100% to 1000 $ x35 | Play | |||
| — | Play | |||
| — | Play | |||
| 125% to 80 $ x35 | Play | |||
| 100% to 400 $ x50 | Play |
Should You Play Mini Roulette for Real Money?
From the abovementioned information, we can conclude that mini roulette is unsuitable for players who expect to achieve the best possible results. Try to find French roulette with the La Partage rule. Fortunately, nowadays, many online casinos offer such games. If your casino lacks them, give preference to European roulette.
If you are lucky enough to find a mini roulette with unusual rules that provide users with additional benefits, do not forget to tell us about it. We will surely test it and calculate whether it suits an efficient game.
Reviews of mini roulette and this article you can leave in the comments. Readers are also encouraged to evaluate articles using asterisks.
